When he was dethroned by his enemies and sent him to underground (Pathal), he begged with them for visiting his People at least once in a year. He was so attached to his people. His request was allowed. Onam is in memory of that annual visit. Hence it is treated as a secular Kerala State festival and celebrated by all people of Kerala irrespective caste, creed or religion. To my knowledge, it is also celebrated in other parts of India by different communities on different names.
PUBLIC CAUSE
A blog giving latest information about public interest issues
Tuesday, 6 September 2022
TWO FACES OF ONAM – VICTORY OF CORRUPTION AND DEFEAT OF MORALITY
When he was dethroned by his enemies and sent him to underground (Pathal), he begged with them for visiting his People at least once in a year. He was so attached to his people. His request was allowed. Onam is in memory of that annual visit. Hence it is treated as a secular Kerala State festival and celebrated by all people of Kerala irrespective caste, creed or religion. To my knowledge, it is also celebrated in other parts of India by different communities on different names.
Tuesday, 17 November 2020
CAN A PERSON DIRECTLY FILE A PETITION IN THE SUPREME COURT OR NOT?
YES is the answer, if it is for the
purpose of enforcement of the Fundamental Rights under part III of the
Constitution of India. In such a case, the Court cannot even decline to
entertain the Petition. It has to act upon it. This is because the Article 32
of the Constitution of India by which this Right to file the Petition directly
in the Supreme Court itself is a Fundamental Right under part III of the Constitution.
This Right cannot even suspended by ordinary laws. In other words, it is
mandatory for the Supreme Court to act upon it.
It is also true that the High Courts below
the Supreme Court are also equipped with similar power under Article 226 of the
Constitution. That power is also wider than the power of the Supreme Court in
the sense that it can be used not only for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights,
but for other purpose too. Still the fact remains that the Supreme Court cannot
abdicate its duty under Article 32 on the ground that the person first not approached
the lower court. Otherwise the very purpose of Article 32 would be powerless and
purposeless.
(“A
FRAUD IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION” part of my autobiography detailing my crusade
against corruption/scams while in service. To know more go to the link: https://www.amazon.in/FRAUD-INDIAN-CONSTITUTION-M-P-JOSEPH-ebook/dp/B00SQKTADY and
enter “LOOK INSIDE” to read the free part.)
Further, the Writ jurisdiction of the
High Court under Article 226 is discretionary in nature, whereas the right to
remedy under Article 32 is compulsory in nature. Therefore, if the Supreme
Court declines to entertain the Petition for enforcement of the Fundamental
Rights under Art.32 only on the ground that the person concerned did not
approach the lower court, that itself become a violation of the Fundamental
Right of the person concerned. That is the reason why the founding Fathers of
the Constitution made the remedy to approach the Supreme Court of India under
Article 32 itself is made a Fundamental Right.
In spite of all these safeguards,
whether the Fundamental Rights are available to the poor illiterate majority
population of India?
Home Page: https://www.manjaly.net
Wednesday, 19 August 2020
JUDGE IN POLITICS? HOW TO REMEDY IT?
It was a situation when a sitting Judge of a High Court in 1986 resigned and immediately filed nomination paper for an election. Then I had written in the Times of India (published on Friday July 4, 1986, page 8 – see the paper cut attached) under the caption ‘Judge in Politics' narrating the bad effect on Judiciary as a whole and a remedy to it as follows:-
“JUDGE
IN POLITICS
It has become routine for some of the judges, right from
the Supreme Court downwards to enter politics, after resigning from the post. I
can understand if they are resigning and filing nomination papers as
independent candidates. But the things are not so. They are becoming direct
nominees of the ruling party, at a time when some of the leading personalities
are denied ticket.
This clearly means that a supreme high court judge,
negotiated with a political party in power. One cannot imagine that without
such negotiation, one fine morning he has declared as an official candidate.
What would be the fate of a case in which he is called
upon to decide, where the political organisation (with which he is negotiating)
is a party?
I suggest that those who have some respect for the
judiciary of its impartiality and independence, should come out openly against
this evil and get the Constitution amended so as to prohibit judges entering
politics directly and immediately, after ceasing to be on bench of the Supreme
Court or high court, for a specified period and make it punishable as a
contempt of the court.
M.
P. JOSEPH
Bombay.”
THIS
ISSUE IS EVERGREEN. But people should be aware of these kinds of lacunae in the
Constitution of India and some people are taking advantage of it. Therefore, it is the need of the hour to get it remedied.
I had already dealt with the general practices of fraudulent practices prevailing in the various establishments of the Government of India in my biographical book part-1., 'A FRAUD IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION'.
{ To get details of my books and blogs, visit home page: https://www.manjaly.net/ }
Saturday, 15 August 2020
BHOPAL GAS LEAK DISASTER AND MY CONTEMPT OF SUPREME COURT
It was published by the
Times of India in its News Paper dated 22-02-1989 in the editorial page. Some
others were also written on the subject. On the very next day of its
publication, I noticed another news column quoting one of the Judges of that
Bench of the Supreme Court which pronounced the order to the effect that
Contempt of Court proceedings were being initiated against the WRITERS. But
nothing had happened. On the contrary, that Judgement was modified in a later
Review Petition. The the letter is given below:
“Sir,
While agreeing with your editorial “A
Judicial Let-Down”(February 16/17) and with full respect to the Supreme Court, I
would like to make a few observations on the Bhopal case.
Firstly, the Supreme Court should
have limited its verdict to the question of interim relief and a well
considered, well reasoned judgement on the whole issue could have been pronounced
later on. Government of India is not the real claimant. It is merely
representing the thousands of affected people. In this context, a few
government servants and UCC officials will create doubts in the minds of the
people. In the past, several negotiations entered into foreign companies have
come under fire. In these circumstances, the supreme court should have exercised
some restraint and care so as to avoid embarrassment.
Secondly, the Supreme Court has no
power to transfer the cases pending before the different courts retrospectively
without even hearing the parties concerned. This is not only unconstitutional
but also against the principles of natural justice which the Supreme Court has
nursed and developed for the last several years.
Hence, it is my humble request to the
highest court to review the decision in its own interest.
Bombay, M.P. JOSEPH”
(N.B.: The judgement was
later reviewed and revised in a later Review Petition.)
{my books:
1. A FRAUD IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION https://www.amazon.in/FRAUD-INDIAN-CONSTITUTION-M-P-JOSEPH-ebook/dp/B00SQKTADY (paperback online sale suspended for the time being)
2. LTC RULES MADE EASY https://www.amazon.in/LTC-RULES-MADE-EASY-date-ebook/dp/B01JO66SLK
3. MY BLOGS: home page: https://www.manjaly.net/
Saturday, 23 May 2020
SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET FOR THE RICH, IN THE NAME OF COVID-19 AFFECTED POOR
&
Wednesday, 22 April 2020
കോവിഡ് – 19:- ലോക്ക്ഡൌണും, മയക്കുമരുന്ന് മാഫിയകളും, പിടികിട്ടാത്ത ചോദ്യവും
M.P. JOSEPH, www.manjaly.net